Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3068
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHossain, Md Sajid-
dc.contributor.authorShufian, Abu-
dc.contributor.authorAshiquzzaman, Md.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-11T06:29:08Z-
dc.date.available2026-11-11T06:29:08Z-
dc.date.issued2026-08-
dc.identifier.citationM. S. Hossain, A. Shufian and M. Ashiquzzaman, "Comparative Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of Solar Thermal Collectors for Domestic Hot Water Integration in Munitibar, Basque Country, Spain," 2026 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), 2026, pp. 355-360, doi: 10.1109/MERCon71835.2026.11691575.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-3195-2266-5-
dc.identifier.issn2691-364X-
dc.identifier.other10.1109/MERCon71835.2026.11691575-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11691575-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3068-
dc.descriptionConference paper published in 2026 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon). Contact email: sajidh@aiub.eduen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comprehensive comparative techno-economic feasibility analysis of four flat-plate solar thermal collector models for Domestic Hot Water (DHW) generation across four municipal buildings in Munitibar, Basque Country, Spain. The four collectors evaluated are: PROMATOP 1.5, PROMATOP 2.0, PROMASUN BLUE 2.0, and the Apricus FPC-A26. Solar irradiance and ambient temperature data for the summer month of June and the winter month of November were extracted from the Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS). Collector efficiency calculations, useful energy output, collector spacing, solar fraction, CAPEX/OPEX analysis, payback period, and environmental impact (CO₂ reduction) are evaluated and compared. Results show that all four collectors significantly exceed the 110% monthly solar fraction limit set by the Spanish CTE regulation when the full roof area is utilized. The PROMASUN BLUE 2.0 offers the shortest payback period of 11.4 years and the lowest CAPEX at €62,850, while the Apricus FPC-A26 delivers the highest total energy output due to favorable roof fit. The PROMATOP 2.0 provides the best balance of efficiency, cost, and performance.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.subjectPVGISen_US
dc.subjectDHWen_US
dc.subjectSolar Thermalen_US
dc.subjectCollector Comparisonen_US
dc.subjectCAPEXen_US
dc.subjectRenewable Energyen_US
dc.subjectCTE Regulationen_US
dc.titleComparative Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of Solar Thermal Collectors for Domestic Hot Water Integration in Munitibar, Basque Country, Spainen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Publications From Faculty of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
28_Comparative_Techno_Economic_Feasibility_Analysis_of_Solar_Thermal_Coll.docx3.27 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.