Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1331
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Rahman, Mahfujur | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hasan, Mehedi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Billah, Md Masum | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sajuti, Rukaiya Jahan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-02T09:20:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-02T09:20:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11-23 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1608 – 3679 (print) 2520 – 4890 (Online) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1331 | - |
dc.description.abstract | People are more dependable on online news systems than ever in this modern time and day. The more people depend on online news, magazines, and journals, the more likely it will have more significant consequences of fake news or rumors. In the era of social networking, it has become a significant problem that negatively influences society. The fact is that the internet has become more accessible than ever, and its uses have increased exponentially. From 2005 to 2020, overall web users have increased from 1.1 billion to 3.96 billion. As most individuals' primary sources are microblogging networks, fake news spreads faster than ever. Thus it has become very complicated to detect fake news over the internet. For that purpose, we have used four traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms and long short-term memory (LSTM) methods. The four traditional methods are as follows logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT) classification, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) classification, and naive bayes (NB) classification. To conduct this experiment, we first implemented four traditional machine learning methods. Then we trained our dataset with LSTM and Bi-LSTM (bidirectional long-short term memory) to get the best-optimized result. This paper experimented with four traditional methods and two deep learning models to find the best models for detecting fake news. In our research, we can see that, from four traditional methods, logistic regression performs best and generate 96% accuracy, and the Bi-LSTM model can generate 99% accuracy, which outbreaks all previous scores. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB) | en_US |
dc.subject | Fake News | en_US |
dc.subject | Political Violence | en_US |
dc.subject | Logistic Regression | en_US |
dc.subject | Decision Tree | en_US |
dc.subject | K-Nearest Neighbors | en_US |
dc.subject | Naive Bayes | en_US |
dc.subject | Long Short-Term Memory | en_US |
dc.subject | Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory | en_US |
dc.subject | Machine Learning | en_US |
dc.title | Political Fake News Detection from Different News Source on Social Media using Machine Learning Techniques | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Publications: Journals |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fake News Detection.pdf | 222.1 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
Fake News Detection_(Front Page).pdf | 384.94 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.