Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2678
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSumaya, Atoshe Islam-
dc.contributor.authorForhad, Shamim-
dc.contributor.authorRafi, Md Al-
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Hamdadur-
dc.contributor.authorBhuyan, Muhibul Haque-
dc.contributor.authorTareq, Qazi-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-13T04:43:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-13T04:43:15Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-07-
dc.identifier.citationA. I. Sumaya, S. Forhad, M. A. Rafi, H. Rahman, Q. Tareq, and M. H. Bhuyan, “Enhanced Plant Disease Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Comparative Study of AlexNet, GoogLeNet, VGG19, ResNet50, and ResNet101,” Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things (AIBThings), the Central Michigan University (CMU), USA, 7-8 September 2024. pp. 1-12. Published on 07 February 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AIBThings63359.2024.10863407en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2678-
dc.descriptionThis work is based on an independent research work.en_US
dc.description.abstractTo meet the increasing need for food from a growing global population, it is imperative to make progress in agricultural technology, namely in the area of disease detection. This will help reduce the need for pesticides and improve the overall health of crops. The issue at hand is the need for accurate and effective identification of plant diseases to enhance food production. This research tackles this problem by using cutting-edge computational neural networks (CNNs) on pre-existing agricultural datasets to assess and compare their effectiveness. Existing research does not show the precise and detailed performance of the latest CNN models in agricultural data sets. We addressed this issue by examining five Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, VGG19, ResNet50, and ResNet101. This approach involved meticulous training and assessment of these models to compare their precision, loss, duration of training, and complexity of the model. ResNet 101 outperformed all other models with an accuracy rate of approximately 97%. Nevertheless, the practical implementation of this technology is hindered by its intricate model complexity and demanding resource needs, which make it unsuitable for low-power applications. GoogLeNet demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy, model complexity, training time, and other evaluation measures.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelf-funded.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2;-
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectPerformance evaluationen_US
dc.subjectPlant diseasesen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical modelsen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectComputational modelingen_US
dc.subjectTime measurementen_US
dc.subjectConvolutional neural networksen_US
dc.subjectResidual neural networksen_US
dc.subjectComparative Analysisen_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of AlexNet, GoogLeNet, VGG19, ResNet50, and ResNet101 for Improved Plant Disease Detection Through Convolutional Neural Networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Publications From Faculty of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Draft_DSpace_Publication_Info_Upload_FE_Prof Muhibul AIBThings 2024.docx3.41 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.