Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/579
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamaduzzaman, Munshi-
dc.contributor.authorFarhana, Nazia-
dc.contributor.authorMou, Musrat-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-02T16:32:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-02T16:32:27Z-
dc.date.issued2014-03-01-
dc.identifier.issn22511571-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/579-
dc.description.abstractQualitative Research methods have been an integral part of many academic disciplines to gather a thorough insight into several issues of interest. The aim of this paper is to present the pros and cons of the most prominent Qualitative research methods available, that are Grounded Theory, Qualitative Interviewing, Participant Observation and finally Case Study Method. Here the theory emergence power of Grounded Theory has been balanced with its time-consuming feature. The capability of Qualitative Interviewing to unearth the understanding of the respondent has been discussed along with the effect of the biasness of the Interviewer. The same follows for Participant Observation, which gives us a contextual connotation of events. A little exploration of the triangulation principle of the Case Study Method and its effectiveness ends this paper.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe International Journal Research Publicationen_US
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_US
dc.subjectIn-Depth Interviewen_US
dc.subjectGrounded Theoryen_US
dc.subjectCase Study Methoden_US
dc.titleExploring the advantages and disadvantages of Qualitative Data Collection Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Publications From FBA : Journal Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nazia Paper 3.docx4.13 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.