Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2456
Title: THE SUPERIORITY OF FEASIBLE SOLUTIONS-MOTH FLAME OPTIMIZER USING VALVE POINT LOADING
Authors: Alam, Mohammad Khurshed
Sulaiman, Mohd Herwan,
Ferdowsi, Asma
Sayem, Md Shaoran
Ringku, Md Mahfuzer Akter
Foysal, Md
Keywords: Moth -Flame Optimization (MFO), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Superiority of Feasible Solutions-Moth Flame Optimizer (SF-MFO), Valve Point Loading.
Issue Date: 9-Sep-2024
Publisher: Results in Control and Optimization,
Abstract: Abstract- The optimal power flow (OPF) problem deals with large-scale, nonlinear, and non-convex optimization challenges, often accompanied by stringent constraints. Apart from the primary operational objectives of an energy system, ensuring load bus voltages remain within acceptable ranges is essential for providing high-quality consumer services. The Moth-Flame Optimizer (MFO) method is inspired by the unique night flight characteristics of moths. Moths, much like butterflies, undergo two distinct life stages: larval and mature. They have evolved the ability to navigate at night using a technique called transverse orientation. This article presents a methodology for determining the optimal energy transmission system configuration by integrating power producers. The MFO, Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Success-history-based Parameter Adaptation Technique of Differential Evolution - Superiority of Feasible Solutions (SHADE-SF), and Superiority of Feasible Solutions-Moth Flame Optimizer (SF-MFO) algorithms are applied to address the OPF problem with two objective functions: (1) reducing energy production costs and (2) minimizing power losses. The efficiency of MFO, SF-MFO, SHADE-SF, and GWO for the OPF challenge is evaluated using IEEE 30-feeder and IEEE 57-feeder systems. Based on the collected data, SF-MFO demonstrated the best performance across all simulated instances. For instance, the electricity production costs generated by SF-MFO are $845.521/hr and $25,908.325/hr for the IEEE 30- feeder and IEEE 57-feeder systems, respectively. This represents a cost savings of 0.37% and 0.36% per hour, respectively, compared to the lowest values obtained by other comparative methods.
Description: NA
URI: http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2456
Appears in Collections:Publications From Faculty of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dr Khurshed RICO 2024.docx2.93 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.