Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2865
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTahsin, Jeba-
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Dipta-
dc.contributor.authorHasan, Md. Manzurul-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-17T08:54:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-17T08:54:02Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationJ. Tahsin, D. Gomes and M. M. Hasan, "An Experimental Analysis on Different Pivot Selection Approaches for the Quicksort Algorithm," 2024 International Conference on Innovations in Science, Engineering and Technology (ICISET), Chittagong, Bangladesh, 2024, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICISET62123.2024.10939753. keywords: {Technological innovation;Arrays;Time complexity;Sorting;Quicksort;Pivot selection;Sorting algorithms;Experimental analysis;Median of Three (MOT);Median of Five (MO5);Median of Seven (MO7);Median of Nine (MO9);Random selection;Time complexity;efficiency;worst-case scenario;Quicksort variations},en_US
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-3503-5549-9-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10939753/authors#authors-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2865-
dc.description.abstractThe research primarily examines the significance of pivot selection of the widely used QuickSort algorithm in order to increase the overall performance and efficiency. Quicksort has an average time complexity of O(nlogn), but its performance can degrade to O(n2) in the worst-case scenario, which occurs when a pivot element is chosen badly. This study focuses on the influence of different pivot selection techniques on the efficiency of the Quicksort algorithm through empirical evaluation. To determine which strategy works best for an individual data set and array size, different methods have been evaluated, aiming to choose a pivot that is in close proximity to the median of the subarray, evaluating their efficiency and any drawbacks. In terms of efficiency, the Median of Seven (MO7) and Median of Three (MO3) exhibits the best results, where MO7 gives an execution time of 0.0112 s and MOT of 0.0124 s. A comparative decision criteria has also been proposed in this research in choosing the optimum approach among the best performing MOT and MO7, where MOT being simpler and MO7 being more efficient. These insights offer practical guidance for optimizing Quick Sort implementations in real-world scenarios, where its performance is paramount.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEE Xploreen_US
dc.subjectQuick Sort Algorithmen_US
dc.subjectWorst-case Complexityen_US
dc.subjectTime Complexityen_US
dc.subjectArray Dataen_US
dc.subjectArray Sizeen_US
dc.subjectOptimization Algorithmen_US
dc.subjectRandom Selectionen_US
dc.subjectNumber Of Comparisonsen_US
dc.subjectAdvanced Strategies , Sorting Algorithmen_US
dc.subjectAverage Execution Timeen_US
dc.titleAn Experimental Analysis on Different Pivot Selection Approaches for the Quicksort Algorithmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Publications: Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
iciset.pdfFirst Page423.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.