Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1226
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyerim-
dc.contributor.authorMondal, Shuvra-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Choon-Gi-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Jin-Young-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-24T10:44:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-24T10:44:39Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationKim, H., Mondal, S., Choi, C. G., & Hwang, J. Y. (2021, January 26). Assessment of the 50 % and 95 % effective paratracheal forces for occluding the esophagus in anesthetized patients. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 36(2), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00652-wen_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-2614-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1226-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the 50% and 95% effective paratracheal forces for occluding the esophagus in anesthetized patients. In 46 anesthetized patients, the upper esophagus was examined using ultrasonography, and the lower paratracheal area over the esophagus just above the clavicle was marked. Manual paratracheal force was applied over that area using a novel pressure sensing device set-up. In the first patient, a 20 N paratracheal force was applied, and the patency of the esophagus was assessed by advancing the esophageal stethoscope. Unsuccessful advancement of the esophageal stethoscope was considered an effective paratracheal force. If advancement of the esophageal stethoscope was successful, the paratracheal force was increased by 2 N for the next patient, and if it was unsuccessful, the force was decreased by 2 N for the next patient. These sequential tests were performed using 12- and 18-Fr esophageal stethoscopes, respectively. According to Dixon and Mood method, the 50% effective paratracheal force (confidence interval) was 18.4 (17.5‒19.3) N with the use of a 12-Fr esophageal stethoscope and 12.8 (11.0‒14.6) N with the use of an 18-Fr esophageal stethoscope. Using probit regression analysis, the 50% and 95% effective paratracheal forces were 18.4 (16.8‒19.6) N and 20.6 (19.4‒27.9) N, respectively, with the use of a 12-Fr esophageal stethoscope, and 12.4 (8.3‒14.4) N and 16.9 (14.7‒37.3) N, respectively, with the use of an 18-Fr esophageal stethoscope. Our findings suggest a guide for applying paratracheal force during rapid sequence induction and tracheal intubation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPressure sensor device’s work was supported by Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government (MOTIE) (20181510102340, Development of a real-time detection system for unidentified RCS leakage less than 0.5 gpm).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computingen_US
dc.subjectFlexible Sensoren_US
dc.subjectHealth Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectTwo dimensional materialsen_US
dc.subjectGrapheneen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the 50 % and 95 % effective paratracheal forces for occluding the esophagus in anesthetized patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Publications From Faculty of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dr. Shuvra_JCMC.docxGraphene Sensor_JCMC3.31 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.