Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/579
Title: | Exploring the advantages and disadvantages of Qualitative Data Collection Methods |
Authors: | Samaduzzaman, Munshi Farhana, Nazia Mou, Musrat |
Keywords: | Qualitative Research In-Depth Interview Grounded Theory Case Study Method |
Issue Date: | 1-Mar-2014 |
Publisher: | The International Journal Research Publication |
Abstract: | Qualitative Research methods have been an integral part of many academic disciplines to gather a thorough insight into several issues of interest. The aim of this paper is to present the pros and cons of the most prominent Qualitative research methods available, that are Grounded Theory, Qualitative Interviewing, Participant Observation and finally Case Study Method. Here the theory emergence power of Grounded Theory has been balanced with its time-consuming feature. The capability of Qualitative Interviewing to unearth the understanding of the respondent has been discussed along with the effect of the biasness of the Interviewer. The same follows for Participant Observation, which gives us a contextual connotation of events. A little exploration of the triangulation principle of the Case Study Method and its effectiveness ends this paper. |
URI: | http://dspace.aiub.edu:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/579 |
ISSN: | 22511571 |
Appears in Collections: | Publications From FBA : Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nazia Paper 3.docx | 4.13 MB | Microsoft Word XML | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.